In an unprecedented display of dissent, ten federal judges have taken the gloves off, criticizing the Supreme Court's handling of Trump-related cases. Their interviews shed light on major concerns about judicial integrity and the shadow docket's murky practices. Key takeaways include:

• Judicial Frustration: The judges expressed significant dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court's approach, suggesting it undermines legal clarity and fairness.
• Shadow Docket Issues: Concerns were raised over the Supreme Court's 'shadow docket' and its tendency to create confusion rather than resolve it.
• Precedent Ignored: The judges argue that the Court fails to apply its own precedents consistently, leading to an unpredictable legal landscape.

Here's the full scoop.